A suggestion
I have been thinking about terrorism, for obvious reasons. In the good old days (as they now seem) we knew what the terrorists wanted. They were basically market capitalists like we were, and they wished to effect a mutually beneficial exchange: Release those 100
The current generation of terrorists is different. They don't appear to want anything other than to be left alone to
All righty, if that's what they want, let's give it to them.
Let's leave the Arab world alone.
We will send them no more of our depraved, decadent and corrupting culture. But that's just the start.
We will also send them no more food, nor seed, nor fertilizer, nor clothes, nor tools, nor building materials, nor medicine, nor hospital equipment, nor agricultural equipment, nor irrigation projects, nor power generators - and especially no more cars, trucks, airplanes, or the spare parts for them. And definitely no more bullets.
We will send them no more information: close down the internet backbone connections, cut the telephone lines, reprogram the communications satellites, recall all the advisors and experts and UN commissions. We will forbid Médicins sans frontieres and their ilk from visiting.
We will send them no more money: cancel the development aid, suspend the charity donations, and send no emergency relief. They can clean up after the next earthquake (or tsunami) by themselves, in the proper Islamic way.
We will start weaning ourselves away from oil, with the intention of not importing another drop after say 2025. (I hope none of my readers is surprised to hear that the world's supply of oil is finite and running out? There will come a time in the very near future when we must do without oil. Would we not be better advised to start working towards this well-known physical fact now, in a time and manner of our choosing, rather than letting it develop into a crisis?)
Congratulations, Arab world: you are now alone. Good luck.
[Update: the former Labour MP David Clark writes in the Guardian on the subject of who the terrorists are, and what they want: Indeed it is a mistake even to regard al-Qaida as an organisation in the traditional sense of the term. At most it is now little more than an idea, fusing ideology with operational method, both of which can be accessed freely via the internet. It is quite meaningless to talk about destroying the "terrorist infrastructure", unless we propose to carpet bomb Microsoft. We have entered the era of do-it-yourself terrorism. Mind you, the idea of carpet-bombing Microsoft does have a certain appeal...]
These are the flowers on my desk this weekend: thistles. They were by far the pretttiest and most interesting flowers on the market-stall this morning.
5 Comments:
That's the key: oil. IMHO, having oil at such a high price is a good thing. It will finally force us to develop alternative sources of energy.
When that happens, we no longer have to deal with countries like Saudi Arabia, which provided the majority of 9/11 pilots.
yes! udge, i'm with you 100% ... i don't want to blow them away, as Bush does ... i just want them to survive without us ... if Islamic extremism works for you, then lets see you build a successful, functioning independent society with it ...
You make sense. If only we could.
Many good action plans here to consider hypothetically. The problem is that we're all so integrated (and you can take that in relative terms when relating to 'fanatics'). We would all suffer without communication. It does seem ridiculous to die for nothing though. Those who went to WWII would cry if they saw what freedom led to.
About thistles -isn't it funny how the most beautiful flowers have a sting?
Another thing: I doubt oil is even going to last for that long, but if it does, the refineries will be too costly to make any profit from it or for the average consumer to afford. Who knows though. I imagine that natural fuel cars have been designed and could be built affordably, but as an industry, solar powered cars or whatever else that's non fossil fuel burning hasn't had enough start-up capital to compete. There is oil in countries all over the world, but the politics governing the countries that export it in each case are different. I don't think shunning accomplishes anything. In my view, when there is a conflict between two parties, one ignoring the other is equivalent to ignoring the problem. The result ends up being that no solutions are even debated.
But, you are right. Perhaps if the West and the East weren't in each others face all the time, we would know who we were and wouldn't have to interfere or feel burdened by our expectations of 'goodness' in this globalized world. We ARE corrupt though, and we thrive on it! That's politics. I think both sides of the argument take each other for granted sometimes, and maybe we all suffer the syndrome of taking our ways as THE way too often. The West and East, Muslim/Christian, rich/poor are scattered thoughout and I'm not sure how you'd split up the Arab world, but I don't think "they" all think our culture is depraved or corrupt, or want it demolished, just the loud aggressive ones do. It's worth probing into people's socioeconomic status and the physical environment that they live in to see a correlation between words and deeds.
Post a Comment
<< Home